Cox & Kings

Rebuilding a 260-Year-Old Travel Brand for the Web

Cox & Kings

Role

Lead Product Designer

Role

Lead Product Designer

Platform

Android, iOS, Web

Platform

Android, iOS, Web

Duration

2 months

Duration

2 months

Scope

Product Strategy • UX Research • Product Design • Design System

Scope

Product Strategy • UX Research • Product Design • Design System

Turning a heritage travel company into a digital-first platform where browsing, planning and booking finally connect.

More Than a Website Refresh

Cox & Kings has been selling travel since 1758. Under new ownership, the company needed a digital platform that matched how people plan trips today.

The existing experience treated every visitor the same. Someone idly browsing destinations and someone ready to book a fixed departure saw identical pages. Group tours and flexible private tours, two genuinely different products for two different kinds of traveller, sat together in one undifferentiated catalogue.

Rather than continuing to build around hardware, Wagr saw an opportunity to become a digital-first petcare platform that could support pet parents through every stage of their journey.

The harder problem underneath was audience. The platform had to work for travellers who want to self-serve in ten minutes and travellers who won't commit until they've spoken to someone, without splitting into two products.

Owning the Product Direction

Beyond designing screens, we defined the product's role, prioritised opportunities and translated business goals into a clear direction the team could build against.

I led design end to end with one other product designer alongside me, covering competitive research, product and UX strategy, information architecture, every core flow, a scalable design system, and an annotated developer handoff carrying implementation detail, edge cases and product logic.

Understanding the Space

Before any screens, we mapped three things:

  • where the category was leaving room,

  • who we were actually designing for, and

  • what the brand could credibly promise.

The competitive gap

We looked across OTAs, curated platforms and luxury specialists, and the pattern was consistent.

  • OTAs own price, speed and self-serve tools, with no storytelling or brand depth and weak personalisation.

  • Curated platforms own customisation and peer reviews, but carry limited trust for high-value bookings and inconsistent recommendation quality.

  • Luxury specialists own narrative and high-touch service at a price point that doesn't scale for the Indian outbound market.

Everyone was strong at one end and weak at the other. Nobody held legacy trust and digital-first discovery at the same time, and that gap became the positioning.

Who we were designing for

Five traveller segments came out of the research, each arriving with a different anxiety.

  • Families with kids or teens, looking for age-inclusive trips and worried about hidden costs.

  • Groups of friends or colleagues, where the real problem is collective decision-making, not the trip itself.

  • Luxury travellers who can't tell one premium tour from another because nothing differentiates them.

  • Seniors, wanting visible accessibility, clear support, and reassurance that someone will pick up the phone.

  • Independent explorers travelling solo, wanting flexibility, safety and proof that people like them have done this.

The same pages had to answer all five without fragmenting into five products.

What the platform had to become

Those two threads pointed at four areas the brand could own: personalisation by traveller type, trust built into the interface rather than the marketing, community and social proof carried through the journey, and discovery flows that work for explorers who don't know where to go as well as deciders who are ready to book.

That left one question.

How might we craft flexible, trusted, and emotionally resonant travel experiences that adapt to today's diverse traveller needs?

flexible

Seamless discovery and hybrid planning. Destination-first, occasion-first or experience-first. Filters written the way travellers think, not the way the catalogue is organised. Instant booking, or an expert one tap away.

trusted

Certifications, tiered pricing and clear inclusions on the card, not three clicks in. After 2019, reassurance had to be structural rather than stated.

emotionally resonant

Community and storytelling. Narrative-led journeys instead of generic grids. Guides, experts and past travellers as voices of trust. Reviews attached to the day they describe.

diverse

Journeys tailored by traveller type, with age-specific inclusions surfaced rather than buried. Five segments arriving with five different fears, one platform.

our north stars

A platform that

reassures

through transparency, credibility markers and clear communication.

Built for browsing, with a way forward from anywhere

Built for browsing, with a way forward from anywhere

Some people arrive with a destination locked in. Some have a month and a budget and nothing else. Some aren't really planning yet.

Trip cards come in three variants, because a card in a listing does a different job from one in a carousel. And on mobile, every card offers a quick look or the full page, so comparing doesn't mean opening and backing out ten times.

Some people arrive with a destination locked in. Some have a month and a budget and nothing else. Some aren't really planning yet.

Trip cards come in three variants, because a card in a listing does a different job from one in a carousel. And on mobile, every card offers a quick look or the full page, so comparing doesn't mean opening and backing out ten times.

Pick your kind of trip before you pick the trip

Pick your kind of trip before you pick the trip

Group and private tours described by who each one suits rather than by product name, with a route to the other from both pages. Filters that stick while you're comparing trips and disappear when you're not. Country pages that open with the country, not the price grid.

Group and private tours described by who each one suits rather than by product name, with a route to the other from both pages. Filters that stick while you're comparing trips and disappear when you're not. Country pages that open with the country, not the price grid.

The whole trip, laid out before you decide

The whole trip, laid out before you decide

A group tour is fixed. Set dates, set route, set group, so you either join or you don't. The page shows everything upfront: day by day opened on a tap, a map alongside for people who read a trip as a route rather than a list, and real availability with sold-out departures removed entirely.

A group tour is fixed. Set dates, set route, set group, so you either join or you don't. The page shows everything upfront: day by day opened on a tap, a map alongside for people who read a trip as a route rather than a list, and real availability with sold-out departures removed entirely.

Travel the way you want to

Travel the way you want to

Private tours are the opposite. Your dates, your route, your pace. But a blank page is its own problem, so a short form generates a starting itinerary and everything after that is editable. Add cities, change nights, swap hotels, watch the price move, with guardrails that stop you breaking it.

Private tours are the opposite. Your dates, your route, your pace. But a blank page is its own problem, so a short form generates a starting itinerary and everything after that is editable. Add cities, change nights, swap hotels, watch the price move, with guardrails that stop you breaking it.

Planning a group trip without the group chat

Planning a group trip without the group chat

Families and friend groups plan trips over long threads nobody can follow. One person answers a few questions, invites the others, and everyone votes on what comes back. Invites cap at the group size chosen, and choosing solo removes the group questions entirely.

Families and friend groups plan trips over long threads nobody can follow. One person answers a few questions, invites the others, and everyone votes on what comes back. Invites cap at the group size chosen, and choosing solo removes the group questions entirely.

Designing for Scale

The hard challenge was making sure launch decisions didn't constrain what came next. Group and private tours share every page except the itinerary, because that's the only part that genuinely differs. Navigation, components, tokens and interaction patterns were built so new destinations and tour types ship without a redesign, with accessibility rules written into the system rather than checked at the end.

Key Learnings

Nobody starts from a blank page. People arrive mid-thought, with half a destination and a rough month in mind. Almost every screen improved once I stopped designing for a clean start.

Small information carries the weight. Departure calendars, cost breakdowns and document auto-fill did more for confidence than anything at the brand level. And heritage worked best as a credibility marker rather than the lead story, since 260 years reassures one audience and dates you to another.